with thanks to thisisnorthkensington.wordpress.com

FTHN: From the Hornets Nest

Comments are welcome but do not necessarily reflect the view of the Dame.
Offensive/inappropriate comments will be deleted and the poster banned.

Get new posts by email:

THIEVES IN THE NIGHT…

The Dame’s supporters have followed this story for years. Particularly in the north of the borough, RBKC has long proved itself incapable of noticing a publicly owned asset, without trying to steal it –  for the benefit of private interests. There’s a pattern:

*Years ago, RBKC sold off the Colville School Laundry building plus half their playground, to the owner of a private French nursery. He’d evicted his own business from his property. Parents were not told. The Chair of parent/teachers was married to an RBKC councillor.

*Then RBKC planned  to demolish the Portobello Ct. council flats; to build shops & luxury flats. In 1948 the Grosvenor Estate donated the land for public housing. The Estate demanded the return of the land.  RBKC’s plan was abandoned.

*Morley College, an institution that’s provided further education for thousands of local people, was sold off to “private educational” interests/flat builders. Hundreds of locals protested. The sale was reversed.

*The N. Kensington public library was declared unsafe for children. RBKC immediately sold it to a local private school. Locals were furious. This ’sale’ was also reversed.

*Twenty years ago RBKC failed to notice that it charged the market £800,000 a year for rubbish. One Saturday 25 metric tonnes of market waste was created. That’s 25,000 kilos a day! £5million was stolen. Residents paid  £1 million for the refund. RBKC claimed there had been a “mistake!”

*RBKC apparently also failed to notice that selling off most of the traders’ storage units would eventually damage the market.

*Major local property owners met regularly, to hatch plans.

*’RBKC’s old markets are legally protected and ring-fenced under Parliamentary Legislation. Licensed street traders have lifelong tenure plus inheritance rights. So RBKC refuses to grant new licences. Only casual traders, with no rights. get a stall.

*Pre-Covid, an estate agent exited the Market Bar. He told the street trader outside that RBKC had done a deal to replace traders with tables & chairs. The licensed trader refused to accept expulsion. The agent disappeared.

*During lockdown, RBKC allowed a single, illegal, oversized gazebo in the market. There are now 100. They cause as much obstruction as possible. Other changes negatively affect market traders and local residents.

*Multiple street table & chairs licence applications mysteriously appeared. They even included one for the street immediately outside Tesco!

*A new RBKC market councillor published a detailed report: “Live, Work, Learn – “RBKC’s Local Economy.” It claimed that Portobello Market has 12 million visitors a year; double the decades-long accepted, Met police figure of 6 million. No research or public consultation was undertaken. After a brief career insulting local flood victims, the councillor responsible for the report disappeared.

*More recently, RBKC has further mismanaged the market. Only tourist tat traders are welcome. Regulations to encourage good order and freedom of movement are ignored.

*Meanwhile, waste piled up. Officers studiously ignored every breach of regulation. Chaos had become policy.

*Another market public consultation was announced; the 3rd or 4th in 50 years. Consultants were engaged. Despite all their hard work; they failed to persuade local residents to demand the closure of the now shambolic market.

*Yet another market councillor announced he used to run private markets. RBKC promptly began unpicking Portobello market; including offering a “BIDS” scheme. So only businesses & landlords would control the market. The street traders declined the offer.

*After 70 years without horses & carts, a chorus of shopkeepers suddenly objected to market vans parked outside their premises.

*Market parking is needed due to the loss of storage. Without vans, each trader works 2 extra hours a day. They refused; so RBKC demanded higher rents. NB Market legal protection excludes parking, because there was once plenty of storage.

*During the latest, £500,000 consultation, one Saturday locals walked the length of the market. It was noted that, for that day alone, no oversized gazebos were evident. They all returned the following week.

*The result of the public consultation was published. The public had overwhelmingly demanded that RBKC must protect the market. RBKC ignored this finding. Each response had cost £75. RBKC’s new plans will destroy the market.

*A new Chair of the traders had a list of 6 qualified, new food sellers to enliven the market. They wished to be licensed traders. The market office failed to grant a single licence.

*Unlawfully, RBKC began misusing traders’ funds to pay invisible additional market staff.

*The alleged results of the latest consultation have just been published. The public insists that the market refreshed. RBKC ignores this. Rather than offer alternatives, the consultants offer one plan; a streetscape designed to destroy the market. Doubtless by coincidence, the new design is ideal for hundreds of street tables & chairs! 

*The councillor currently responsible for the market and the consultation, was to retire at the end of 2025. But events have not yet gone according to plan. So he will stay on to see it through.

*The project is to “secretly” replace a 160 year old street market and its hundreds of workers with 30+ third-rate, overpriced restaurants & scores of bars trading late into the night in a long and narrow, highly residential street. Tables & chairs will spread across pavements and road in the summer; while local residents are trapped in their homes for the sake of a makeshift “security” system. 

*A 20m block of Kensington Park Rd. is shut for 6 to 7 months to lay fancy new granite setts. RBKC’s also plans to lay them along Portobello Rd. The block between Westbourne Grove & Elgin Crescent Is 250m long. So that block will be shut for 5 years! Residents will be trapped. The market and every businesses will disappear; but RBKC apparently believes it’s a price worth (citizens) paying!

*Meanwhile there’s no evidence that without the market, the millions of visitors a year needed to fill all the new restaurants & bars, will leave the West End just to visit other restaurants & bars! Property owners won’t worry; they will already have the businesses tied into hugely overpriced leases; based on RBKC’s, published, faked up visitor numbers. Etc.

Signed

A. Witness

19 responses to “THIEVES IN THE NIGHT…”

  1. Interested Party Avatar
    Interested Party

    This article is astounding; but I know it’s true. The council and property owners intend to steal the famous Portobello Market from residents and the people who earn a living working in it.

    It must be illegal for a council to overcharge the market traders and equally illegal for it to organise public consultations that produce untrue results.

    The council is treading on very dangerous ground; not for the first time. It seems they think the only people with a brain work for them. That how stupid they are!

  2. Time For Answers Avatar
    Time For Answers

    On Wednesday a well-attended market meeting was held. The subject was the gentrification aka destruction of Portobello Market.

    Many pointed questions were asked. Officers and RBKC’s expensive consultants were not pleased. The councillor responsible for the project sat silent; deep in concentration on the discussions. Officers did their best to bat questions away. Explaining the details of making silk purses from sows ears, is never easy. (Olde English saying.)

    RBKC’s expensive consultants explained the latest plans for the southern entrance to the market, from NHG station. Expensive granite setts (stone bricks) will be laid everywhere. The consultants mood was not improved when asked: “Why?” They were at a loss for an answer. The eventual response was: because they’re pretty! Other questions were asked. Specialists redesigning a street market, did not know the size of a market stall. They were asked why the pavements will be so wide. Answer: so people can walk on them – in a road with no traffic! They were also asked why the market vans will be parked on those pavements, directly outside shops. Shopkeepers will be furious and demand their removal. Market traders need their vans; so the traders will go. Then, what use can be made of the huge new pavements? Answer: hospitality tables & chairs! And that is the entire point of this years’ long exercise.

    During the meeting, an officer was clearly not pleased at the questions. He fought valiantly for control. He is to be congratulated on his success.

  3.  Avatar
    Anonymous

    An interesting piece written by Mr or Ms “A Witness.” It would not surprise me of this came from the pen of a councillor who wants to get elected again.

    1. Urban destruction. Avatar
      Urban destruction.

      “Theft of publicly owned assets.” This sounds like the stuff of Marxism. It will be water off a duck’s back to the Tories.

    2.  Avatar
      Anonymous

      I remember the “I’ll fight you for it” campaign for Covent Garden back in the sixties and seventies. Left wingers tried very hard to save Covent Garden from the gentrifiers but the Tory Council in Westminster won the day. I’m sure that K&C’s Tory Councillors know how to achieve what they want.

  4. Be political and use language with more precision. Avatar
    Be political and use language with more precision.

    The behaviour of the Council outlined in this article is reprehensible.

    Thieves in the night?? I don’t think so.

    The conduct complained of does not constitute “theft.” The writer has done an injustice to the serious and legitimate issues mentioned by using the language of those on the hard left. Jeremy Corbyn style rhetoric, declaring something as theft, when it is not theft, may be good for rousing the rabble. It is emotive rather than accurate or political and only impresses the hard left – Marxists and their ilk. I used to be in the Socialist Worker Party and they taught me this technique at one of their weekend schools.

  5. MR Quette Avatar
    MR Quette

    This makes a lot of sense; particularly the bit about the council stealing from the public realm. Understandably, after the way it’s treated, the north of the borough never votes Tory. It’s mostly Labour plus, at one time, some Lib Dems.

    One of the biggest problems in the market area now is that there are no councillors. It seems the extreme leftists forced out 3 good Labour councillors and replaced them with their own. The replacements did just enough work to get their payments of £30,000 a year each. They’ve done nothing for anyone since.

    They were supposed to be part of an extreme left wing tide, that would ultimately rule the world! Except, it didn’t happen. Meanwhile Hornton St and big business have been busy making sure the market disappears. So much for socialism!

    Thankfully, it’s been the lazy 3’s turn to be forced out. Their replacements will go back to serving the public rather than themselves. Roll on the local elections!

    Signed: M. R. Quette.

    1. Come back all is forgiven Avatar
      Come back all is forgiven

      I would like to see former, good, Labour Councillors return to the Council to serve the public. I remember the hard working Monica Press and the redoubtable and estimable, Ian Henderson. Come back all is forgiven.

      I have even come across Tory councillors who have both admiration and respect for Monica and Ian.

      What is being done to shaft those who took over and did very little for anyone except pick up the bungs for themselves.

  6. anon Avatar
    anon

    Anonymous 6th Nov. shouldn’t be so negative. The difference between Covent Garden and Portobello market is vast.

    Covent Garden is in the heart of the West End; Theatreland and near the Law Courts. Lawyers and their clients make excellent customers for expensive restaurants. Incidentally, it’s said that the success of Covent Garden has destroyed nearby Soho; once the heart of London’s nightlife. Covent Garden also has the Royal Opera House, the Piazza and London’s first architect designed square. They are magnificent.

    Portobello is just a long, narrow and crooked road, leading north towards one of the poorest areas in London and possibly in Europe. If the council has funds to spare, it should spend them on those living north of the Westway.

    If this plan goes ahead, tourists staying in the West End will have to leave it to walk through a little back street, for very little except overpriced, third rate restaurants, bars & cafes. Why should they? The West End is already full of such establishments. Of course some will; but not the numbers needed to support multiple new businesses.

    No doubt the council is aware of this problem. Some years ago, it “published” a secret report called “Live Work Learn, the Local Economy. The word ‘published, is highlighted because, there was no visible research, no consultations; no publicity and no known publication date. However, it has served and may continue to serve its purpose. It includes the false claim that 12 million visitors a year walk through the market. No doubt the new, hospitality companies will be shown this report to justify the inflated cost of their leases.

    For decades the council, traders and residents accepted an old Met police figure of 6 million a year. Until independent research is carried out in public, any higher figure is false.

    Locals with long experience know that only a small percentage of tourists are wealthy enough to routinely dine in the large numbers that will be needed to sustain 100 or so hospitality premises; some very large premises.

    During the recent public consultation on these radical plans, local people overwhelmingly supported the market. It’s high time RBKC acted for the. benefit of the local community, rather than private commercial interests.

    Then there’s the small matter of the hundreds of working, market people who, over 160 years, have made the market so famous. They’re no longer local, because virtually no working class people can afford to live in the area. If Portobello market and its people are lost, the council will bear the full responsibility.

    1.  Avatar
      Anonymous

      It sounds like you are gleeful about the urban destruction that took place in Covent Garden in the 60’s and 70’s where the poor people were forced out of their “rooms.” “Rooms” that they privately rented. Some tenants had been there for forty years plus – since before the war. The “expensive restaurants” which came on stream in Covent Garden came before its people, its working class community. Now that’s what I call Gentrification and Urban Destruction.

      Note: “rooms” not flats. Those “rooms” were people’s homes You are no socialist!

      Soho thrives economically (and always has thrived) as part of the entertainment and night life scene to this very day just like Covent Garden now does. Westminster City Council’s data proves that.

  7. anon 2 Avatar
    anon 2

    Not a councillor, surely? They were all in it up to their necks. I remember the Old Laundry scandal. The owner of the nursery was a lord. He owned a really big house near David Cameron’s. A house without a nursery in the basement is worth a lot more than with it. So chuck local kids out of part of their school and give away half their small playground to a bunch of little rich kids and everyone who counts is happy. It was all supposed to be a secret.

    The council was so pleased to help a lord and local labour councillors didn’t notice a thing. Local people didn’t vote for them for years afterwards. We always have to keep a close eye on politicians. The current local dodgy ones have just been thrown out. Let’s hope the new lot are an improvement.

  8. Felicity Naive Avatar
    Felicity Naive

    Time to think on………….

    If the Tories wanna do it, they’ll do it. They won’t give a sh*t about the market or what locals think. If they wanna have restaurants, bars and cafes with no customers in them then that is what we’ll get.

    The same Tory Council ignored the interests of Grenfell residents, despite receiving representations form residents about fire safety and other issues, but they still did what they wanted with disastrous consequences.

    This Tory Council is not interested in reason, sensible economic development or what people think. It is called arrogance. So go figure.

  9. A. Neighbour Avatar
    A. Neighbour

    Felicity Naive is largely correct. However, many current Portobello residents are wealthy. They chose Portobello because they love it. Angry, wealthy local residents are what RBKC seeks to avoid. On the other hand, the council has always seen those in public housing as unworthy of their notice; much less care. Hence the tragedy of Grenfell. Does anyone seriously believe that RBKC’s multiple and very evident failings to protect the Grenfell residents would have occurred in luxury Knightsbridge apartments?

    RBKC has always shown a similar attitude towards working class street traders. They created an international cultural treasure. In the eyes of the Council; just as bad; most visitors are young; ordinary people from abroad. They don’t have eighty pounds each to spend on lunch. They buy a souvenir and a sandwich and have a great time. So for RBKC, they too are disposable.The Council ignores public opinion to hijack one of London’s most popular attractions; so a few property owners and certain well-placed persons, not unconnected with it; can enrich themselves. RBKC even published fake tourist figures to justify the expected bonanza in commercial rents that will result from their brilliant, secret plan!
    .
    It was all so clever. After very expensive consultations, RBKC has published a second design for the streetscape. In all key aspects, it’s identical to the first i.e. it will “accidentally” destroy the world famous market. It wiII become a pathetic copy of Covent Garden; once London’s wholesale fruit & vegetable market. The public response to the original public consultation demanded:

    “Portobello Road must still look like a road, in keeping with the identity of the market and:

    Avoid “funky” designs etc.

    Despite this, If the current plan goes ahead; 1km of hugely expensive stone setts will be laid. N.B. The very short stretch of setts currently being laid in Kensington Park Road will take up to 10months of obstruction to complete. Vehicles and pedestrians can’t move! The restaurants are dying. In Portobello, similar works will take up to 10years! When they are complete, vans will park on the new, wide pavements; guaranteeing shops demand their removal! The traders need vans, so they twill go. Residents will have paid RBKC to destroy their neighbourhood. For RBKC: project completed. A dozen or two rich people will be richer and everyone else can go hang!

    Those who can; please find the latest Portobello public consultation on the RBKC website – or find paper copies wherever RBKC has hidden them; to protest against this vandalism and greed!

  10. Markets. Avatar
    Markets.

    Oh, I don’t know so much. The well heeled flock to the swanky and ever so expensive restaurants in Notting Hill. The restaurants in the West End haven’t folded because people are also lunching and dining in Notting Hill instead of in Fitzrovia, Covent Garden and Soho. High end restaurants and cafes in Portobello is just what the area needs. It is all about “markets” and economic outcomes not so called historic markets and community assets. Tory Councillors love “markets” which make money, not “street markets” with greasy spoon cafes and traditional “boozer Bars.”.

    “A Neighbour” is spot on. The truth is the many failings of TMO Board Members, TMO Executive Directors, and their incompetent officials along with the bungling councillors on various so called RBKC scrutiny and review committees resulted in the Grenfell tragedy with the loss of 72 lives. The same thing would not have happened in a top end block of flats in Knightsbridge. But there again, the Council does not do social housing estates in Knightsbridge and those working in the high end “market” of redevelopment tend to be competent.

    I’ m looking forward to a more up market Portobello with nice eateries.

  11.  Avatar
    Anonymous

    I’ve got a Council flat in Portobello. I don’t have a Rolls Royce outside the block. I’m not well off. I get Pension Credit to boost me pension. I love the restaurants in St. James’s, just south of Piccadilly, and I save up to treat myself there. I like eating at The Caprice near St James’s Palace. Just imagine, The Caprice in Portobello. It’d be nice and handy for me.

  12. Opportunism Knocks Avatar
    Opportunism Knocks

    The trouble with socialists is that they go in to battle on “populist” community issues. But just what did all these leftists do to support Francis O’Connor of the Grenfell Action Group. I’m told – Sweet F A.

    God bless you, Francis.

    1. It is a question of, when to be oppositionist. Avatar
      It is a question of, when to be oppositionist.

      Some socialist see their role as one of being “oppositionist” to any proposals made by the Tories.

      Socialists are not right about everything. Neither are the Tories are not wrong about everything.

  13. Remembering Francis O'Connor Avatar
    Remembering Francis O’Connor

    Socialism did nothing of practical noteworthiness for Grenfell until after that awful, ghastly, fire. Just as socialists with their appeal to base emotion over the future of the market will achieve nothing for the working classes living in the area.

    The late Francis O’Connor had more vitality in his little finger than any of the Labour and Tory Councillors on the Council at that time. He was an outstanding community activist – a good man.

    Can we have some sort of permanent memorial to Francis O’Connor after the Tower comes down? It would be an appropriate valediction to a “great man.”

  14.  Avatar
    Anonymous

    What a long winded article this is about the market! The socialist writer seems to have thrown everything at the issue including the kitchen sink in desperation to find a new hobby horse to ride. Such will be the want of every good socialist in Kensington now that the Grenfell Inquiry has reported. The writer has forgotten that he needs to make selective use of his evidence so that readers do not lose interest.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *